不同波系配置的鼓包压缩面流动特性实验研究

doi:10.13675/j.cnki. tjjs. 180506

推进技术 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 1752-1758.DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki. tjjs. 180506

不同波系配置的鼓包压缩面流动特性实验研究

南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院，江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:刘亚洲，硕士生，研究领域为内流空气动力学。E-mail：liuyazhou379 @163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目 11532007;中国博士后科学基金 2016M600412国家自然科学基金重点项目（11532007）；中国博士后科学基金（2016M600412）。

Experimental Research on Flow Characteristics of Bumpswith Different Compression Configurations

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System,College of Energy and Power Engineering,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究波系配置对鼓包压缩面流动特性的影响，通过纹影和基于纳米粒子示踪的平面激光散射系统（NPLS）观测以及压力测量等实验手段，研究了三种不同波系配置的鼓包压缩面诱导的复杂流动，获得了鼓包压缩面上的压力分布、边界层分布特性以及鼓包压缩面上的精细流场结构。结果表明：三种不同波系配置的鼓包压缩面均具有边界层排移能力，在鼓包对称面上，沿流向边界层不断降低，边界层不断向两侧排移，在鼓包侧面形成堆积。尽管如此，压缩过程的不同，边界层的排移过程存在一定差异，对于单锥鼓包，其最先将低能边界层排移掉，而双锥和等熵锥鼓包略为迟缓，但三种鼓包末端的边界层厚度大体一致。此外，三种鼓包压缩面对称面上前中部压力梯度存在较大差异，但鼓包末端具有相同的压力分布。因此，在保证总偏转角一致的情况下，具体选用哪种鼓包配波方式对于边界层排移、增压能力而言没有显著的差异。

关键词: 进气道;边界层排移;波系配置;流动显示;增压能力;鼓包

Abstract: To investigate the effects of shock wave system configuration on the flow characteristics of the bump compression surface， the flow characteristics of three bumps with different compression configurations are experimentally investigated. Schlieren photography, nano particle-tracer based planar laser scattering （NPLS） methods as well as pressure measurement are employed during the test. The pressure distribution, boundary layer features and the fine flow structures on the bump are obtained. The results show that all the three bumps have the ability to remove the boundary layer, the boundary layer thickness on the center plane of the bump gets thinner along streamwise direction, the boundary layer is diverted to the two sides of the bump and accumulates there. However, the diverting process with different compression configurations is different. For the single bump, it first diverts the low energy boundary layer, whereas the process is delayed on the bipyramid bump and isentropic bump. However, the boundary layer thickness at the end of the bump is almost the same. In addition, though the pressure gradient on the fore and middle part of the symmetry plane of the three bumps is quite different, the pressure at the end of the bump is on the same level. Therefore, if the total deflection angle of the bump holds constant, the compression configuration has less impact on the diverting ability of boundary layer and compression capability.

Key words: Inlet;Diverting of boundary layer;Compression configurations;Flow visualization;Compression capability;Bump

. 不同波系配置的鼓包压缩面流动特性实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(8): 1752-1758.

参考文献

[1] 文杨. DSI进气道介绍与使用机型分析[J]. 航空档案， 2009，（8）： 6-10
[2] Gridley M C， Cahill M J. ACIS Air Induction System Trade Study[R]. AIAA96-2646.
[3] Gridley M C， Walker S H. Inlet and Nozzle Technology for 21st Century Fighter Aircraft[R]. ASME 96-GT-244.
[4] Hamstra J W， McCallum B N， Sylvester T G， et al. Transition Shoulder System and Method for Diverting Boundary Layer Air[P]. US： 5749542， 1998-05-12.
[5] Hehs E. JSF Diverterless Supersonic Inlet[R]. Washing D C: Lockheed Martine Aeronautics Company， 2000.
[6] McFarlan J D. Lockheed Martin’s Joint Strike Fighter Diverterless Supersonic Inlet[R]. Washing D C： Lockheed Martine Aeronautics Company， 2000.
[7] 杨应凯，李玉璞. JSF X-35的一绝——无附面层隔道超声速进气道[J]. 国际航空， 2001， (8):13-15.
[8] 杨应凯. 枭龙飞机Bump进气道设计[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报， 2007， 39(4): 449-452.
[9] Simon P C， Dennis W B， Huff R G. Performance of External-Compression Bump Inlet at Mach Numbers of 1.5 to 2.0[R]. NACA-RM-E56L19， 1957.
[10] Hamstra J W， Sylvester G T. System and Method for Diverting Boundary Layer Air[P]. US： 5779189， 1998-07-14.
[11] 李博，梁德旺. 无隔道超声速进气道/前机身一体化计算与试验[J]. 航空学报， 2009， 30(9): 1597-1604.
[12] 王龙，钟易成，吴晴，等. 双锥Bump压缩面设计及气动特性[J]. 航空动力学报， 2013， 28(1): 82-89.
[13] 钟易成，余少志，吴晴. 凸包(Bump)进气道/DSI模型设计及气动特性研究[J]. 航空动力学报， 2005， 20(5): 740-745.
[14] Tan Hui-jun， Guo Rong-wei. Design and Wind Tunnel Study of Top-Mounted Diverterless Inlet[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2004， 17(2)： 72-78.
[15] 杨应凯. Bump进气道设计与试验研究[J]. 空气动力学学报， 2007， 25(3): 336-338.
[16] 谢雪明，郭荣伟. 无隔道进气道RCS特性实验研究[J]. 航空学报， 2006， 27(2): 193-197.
[17] Tillotson B J， Loth E， Dutton J C， et al. Experimental Study of a Mach 3 Bump Compression Flowfield[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2012， 25(3): 545-554.
[18] 梁德旺，李博. 无隔道进气道反设计及附面层排除机理分析[J]. 航空学报， 2005， 26(3): 286-289.
[19] Lo K H， Zarebehtash H， Kontis K， et al. Control of F low Separation on a Contour Bump by Jets in a Mach 1.9 Free-Stream: An Experimental Study[J]. Acta Astronautica， 2016， 126（4）: 229-242.
[20] Sang， Dug， Kim. A Computational Study on the Influence of a Bleed Slot on the Flowfield of a Bump-Type Inlet[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology， 2015， 12(12): 5245-5250.
[21] 赵振山，马晓光，杜羽. 某Bump进气道流动控制计算研究[J]. 空气动力学学报， 2016， 34(4): 476-481.
[22] 王娇，谭慧俊，黄河峡. Bump进气道中鼓包诱导的激波/边界层干扰特性[J]. 航空动力学报， 2018， 33(1): 97-107.
[23] Huang Guo-ping. Design Method of Internal Waverider Inlet under Non-Uniform Upstream for Inlet/Forebody Integration[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2018， 74(4): 160-172
[24] Zhao Y， Yi S， Tian L， et al. The Fractal Measurement of Experimental Images of Supersonic Turbulent Mixing Layer[J]. Science China-Physics Mechanics & Astronomy， 2008， 51(8): 1134-1143.

不同波系配置的鼓包压缩面流动特性实验研究

Experimental Research on Flow Characteristics of Bumpswith Different Compression Configurations

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价